Coders {cookies} benchmark 2026

Eye Comfort Engineering Report

A standalone HTML version of the objective JSON-only benchmark for Coders Cookies Eye Comfort. It preserves unavailable fields instead of filling gaps with estimates.

Theme: dark Background #191D1B Unique colors: 30 Token rules: 17
14.99/20WCAG accessibility score
6.14/15CIEDE2000 syntax separation
7.95/8Background luminance score
9.12/10Terminal readability score
Method note: metrics are computed from the supplied VS Code theme JSON. Anything requiring competitor files, rendered screenshots, language tokenization, or user-study data is marked Not Available. The requested component weights sum to 105, so this report preserves those weights and normalizes to /100.

1. Theme Information

FieldValue
Theme NameCoders Cookies Eye Comfort
AuthorHritik Raj
Typedark
Background#191D1B
Foreground#C6D2C9
Accent Colors#74C98C, #84C9B0, #65786C, #D9B27C
Number of Unique Colors30
Number of Token Colors17
Overall Palette SummaryAverage saturation 30.32%, average blue channel 147.5, background luminance 0.01165.

2. WCAG Accessibility

PairABContrastAAAAA
7.84Average contrast
3.61Lowest contrast
10.92Highest contrast
14.99WCAG score /20

3. Syntax Separation

PairColor AColor BDelta E00
17.64Average Delta E
0.00Minimum Delta E
32.17Maximum Delta E
6.14Syntax score /15

4. Contrast Consistency

7.61Average contrast
2.50Standard deviation
3.61Minimum contrast
4.51/10Consistency score

5. Saturation Comfort

30.32%Average saturation
39.74%Median saturation
5Colors below 20%
3.46/10Saturation score

Comfort zone target: 40-55%. No colors exceed 70%, but the palette is mathematically too gray under this scoring model.

6. Blue Light Energy

RoleColorBlue ChannelBlue Dominant
147.5Average B
201Maximum B
0.0%Blue dominant colors
4.91/10Blue light score

7. Background Luminance

0.011645Relative luminance
27.6/255Brightness
YesSoft black
7.95/8Background score

8. OLED Optimization

0.0%Pure black
0.0%Near black
22.5%RGB emission proxy
3.05/5OLED score

Average background RGB: (51.6, 68.1, 52.7).

9. IPS Optimization

27.6Gray lift
27.6Background brightness
2.50Contrast stability stddev
2.77/3IPS score

10. Astigmatism Safety

0.00/5White halo risk
0.31/5Accent bloom risk
3.08High contrast spike
7.83/8Astigmatism score

11. Circadian Friendliness

2:0Warm vs cool ratio
0.0%Blue dominance
2.89/4Night coding score
2.89/4Circadian score

12. Accessibility

MetricValue
AAFail for at least one computed pair
AAAFail for at least one computed pair
Color Blind SimulationNot Available - requires rendered syntax samples
DeuteranopiaNot Available
ProtanopiaNot Available
TritanopiaNot Available
Can syntax still be distinguished?Risk for at least one computed role pair
Accessibility Score2.50/5

13. Visual Noise Index

12 / 30Syntax colors / unique theme colors
30.32%Average saturation
29.0%Visual noise
7.10/10Noise score

14. Semantic Consistency

RoleRulesUnique ColorsConsistencyColors
50.0%Overall consistency

15. UI Consistency

AreaColors PresentConsistency Score
3.86/10UI consistency score

16. Diff Readability

StateColor
Added#223128
Removed#332A25
Modified#D9B27C
Conflict#D9B27C
Selection#214230
4.24Average contrast against editor background

17. Terminal

ANSIColorContrast
9.12/10Readability score

18. Language Coverage

LanguageCoverage

Coverage percentage is Not Available because language support requires tokenized fixtures or rendered samples, not only theme JSON scopes.

19. Color Harmony

Hue distribution: 142, 142, 137, 158, 135, 35, 142, 35, 155, 155, 155, 135 degrees.

N/ATriadic
N/AComplementary
ProxyAnalogous clustering
6.60/10Harmony score

20. Long Session Fatigue

2.50Contrast stability stddev
29.0%Visual noise
57.8%Blue energy
5.18/7Fatigue score

21. Performance

MetricValue
Unique Colors30
Token Rules17
Semantic Rules8
Unused ColorsNot Available - requires VS Code render/scope coverage trace
Redundant Colors#5FB07E, #C6D2C9, #93A89B, #D97D66, #2E7A50, #191D1B, #74C98C, #1F2421, #2A322D, #252B27, #84C9B0, #D9B27C, #C2CF9E, #263029, #141816, #7C8E82, #A6CBB6, #6FC2A0
Optimization SuggestionsConsider color aliases for repeated values.

22. Final Benchmark

63.01/100Overall score
66.16/105Raw weighted score
CLetter grade
Needs improvementRank

Strengths: WCAG contrast, green/amber low-blue palette, soft dark background, broad UI/terminal color coverage.

Weaknesses: world rank and exact language/color-blind behavior require external JSONs and rendered fixtures.

Engineering Suggestions: add rendered token fixtures for every supported language and run the same analyzer over competitor theme JSONs before making public world-rank claims.

23. World Benchmark Comparison

Reference ThemeComparison

Expected Rank, top competitors, likely advantages, and likely weaknesses are Not Available without reference profile data. Confidence is high for internal metrics only.

24. Awards

AwardResultBasis